Skip to content
For research use only. Not for human or animal consumption. Read the content policy

Site Feedback

One last thing I wasn’t clear about was some (unsubstantiated) claims

Started by Member 22143 24 replies 6 people Last activity Jul 8, 2026

OP
Apr 11, 2026 #1
One last thing I wasn’t clear about was some (unsubstantiated) claims were made that taking zinc and ghkcu together diminished effectiveness. Claude said it was bs tho
Link Reply
Apr 12, 2026 #2
I thought so as well. Maybe it’s just the fact that I fasted for a week my skin is dull- I don’t think 4-5 shots of 5mg would do anything much in the way of degradation
Link Reply
May 4, 2026 #8
i want a nice tan quickly but nothing super unnatural looking
Link Reply
May 7, 2026 #9
i understand mt2 would be much quicker just worried im gonna look overly dark
Link Reply
May 8, 2026 #10
Tanning wise, I believe they’re roughly equivalent. Different is the nausea and libido from MT2
Link Reply
May 9, 2026 #11
MT2 can be used for a quick, natural tan as long as you’re cautious about dosing and time with UV exposure
Link Reply
May 24, 2026 #13
It is safer than MT2, with fewer side effects, and above all, it is an FDA-approved molecule, so there is better research on it. After that, MT2 is more powerful; you get faster tanning results, but you also get all the collateral effects that come with it.
Link Reply
May 26, 2026 #14
That’s been my experience mt2 tans a lot faster but feels dirty and is more systematic messes with my stomach a lot but holy the tan is awesome
Link Reply
May 27, 2026 #15
MT1 is more a natural too I noticed. I tryed both, prefer MT1
Link Reply
Jun 3, 2026 #16
Mt1 was smooth and slower for me but I don’t tan very well
Link Reply
Jun 4, 2026 #17
Yeah, it's kinda scary, lmao, but when I tried the MT1, I had zero side effects and a tan as awesome as MT2 (and more natural, I think).
Link Reply

Go to the end of the thread to reply →