Skip to content
For research use only. Not for human or animal consumption. Read the content policy

Site Feedback

I bought into this shit when I first got into peptides

Started by Member 80880 17 replies 5 people Last activity Jun 10, 2026

OP
Apr 7, 2026 #1
I bought into this shit when I first got into peptides
Link Reply
Apr 10, 2026 #2
It’s such dogshit, just take HGH or don’t bother
Link Reply
Apr 11, 2026 #3
Reta is worth the money, everything else is sort of unnecessary. Like yes mots-c will help but like is there any need ? Probably not
Link Reply
Apr 19, 2026 #5
If you can get accutane I’d just take that instead of the ghk cu but ghk cu will be effective
Link Reply
Apr 25, 2026 #7
There is a lot of cope around HGH for some reason. Not sure why. It’s relatively safe.
Link Reply
May 2, 2026 #9
Suppose it all depends on what you want to achieve. But from the original post it’s fat burning presumably.
Link Reply
May 16, 2026 #10
Theres this billionaire Bryan Johnson on yt that tries to reverse his aging and etc - he was asked about peptides being “dangerous” and not FDA approved and he actually dismissed most of that, except HGH which he said did “destructive damage”
Link Reply
May 18, 2026 #11
It’s relatively safe when IGF-1 is monitored, which is mandatory for every person being treated medically. The same cannot be said for people blindly injecting some random amount of IUs, which tend to be far higher doses, but especially over a long periods. With rHGH so cheap that the lowest IQ can afford to run it year round with no clue what their IGF is will lead to disaster for some. The problems are slow to develop, like organ enlargement and bone deformities, often difficult to detect, and not necessarily easily linked to GH use, since few would be willing to admit it to their doctors. Then what’s the likelihood they’ll post about it on social media. Just recently you finally have some bodybuilders attributing the transformation of their facial structure to running GH at high doses, instead of blaming a permanent 50% increase in nose width and ear size, changes in shoe size, and rings no longer fitting, to “aging”. Yet even people prescribed the typical low clinical rHGH doses have occasionally fallen through the cracks and weren’t properly monitored, so their IGF-1 went too high, and after a few years ended up in very bad shape. If you want to be safe, you need to check IGF-1 and adjust dose so you either stay in physiological range, or no more than 1 standard deviation above it. And that’s going to be different for everyone. 6iu might be ok for one person and 2iu might be too much for another. If you don’t, and end up with a lifetime of joint problems and an enlarged, inefficient heart, don’t cry about not knowing the risks. Becoming “GH Ugly” and needing bigger shoes are the least of the problems.
Link Reply
May 23, 2026 #12
I’d like to think that people taking HGH are somewhat responsible and tbh it’s on you if you aren’t responsible with it
Link Reply
May 25, 2026 #14
In my experience at least 95% of people using GH now have no idea what their IGF-1 is. If they did, the most common question wouldn’t be “How many IUs should I use”, and they get a bunch of different answers, none of which are ever “start with 2 and check your IGF-1 after a couple of weeks and adjust”
Link Reply
May 31, 2026 #15
Because you are asking soccer moms and random people outside of bodybuilders who use it and have used it for years and years, vs the random normal people who have no clue what they are doing
Link Reply
Jun 1, 2026 #16
Can’t say I’ve spoke to many people or given guidance about taking HGH but like it’s their risk. Play stupid games and win stupid prizes.
Link Reply
Jun 10, 2026 #17
Those pros are using like half a bottle to a bottle of serostim a night tho
Link Reply

That was the end of the thread

You just read 17 posts from 5 people in Site Feedback, written between Apr 2026 and Jun 2026.

Reading stays open to everyone — nothing here is behind a login. An account adds one thing: the ability to answer.